http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/documents/quotingguide.htmlWhile we are at it any chance of you replying with the new text at to top of
the Email string Colin?
Ralph
I'm not sure he meant threads either. I suspect he meant just text.I trust you know more about MX5s than you do about email protocol.
They are not email strings. In email groups they are called threads. THe only
Threads are started with an original (non-replied to) email, replies are
then sorted automatically and shown in a
tree view by capable email clients. Some email clients are so lame they
actually strip out the References: headers
in the email and break the thread view.
For instance, Colin, who uses Forte Agent 1.6/32.525, has his reply
underneath Ralph's, but Jeff Curtin, who uses
Hotmail (prime example of lame email client), has his reply out on it's
own, as if it was the start of a thread, not a
reply. like the subject (RE: Cam belt) would indicate.
/ "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably thereason why many post at the top is because Microsoft have so dictated in their
lame Email clients to do so thus moving away from the Email convention.
day they start making vacuum cleaners." -Ernst Jan Plugge/
Outlook* has a nasty habit of downloading external links embedded inHtml postings are also frowned upon in most email groups. Security wise it is
not wise to use html either.
HTML. This can cause all sorts of issues, one of which is that
spam senders can automatically validate email address's simply by you
opening their (HTML) mail.
BTW, someone on ORCON has a nasty virus. I cannot correlate who, as
this mailing list strips out the "Received:" header before passing
the email to the list, but they are (port-219-88-136-63.orcon.net.nz
[219.88.136.63]). If this is you, you are annoying EVERYONE on this
list, FIX IT.
Rex
From Davidm@Snackmate.com Fri Apr 27 18:19:29 2007
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Tyres
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 08:29:57 +1200
Thread-Topic: Tyres
Thread-Index: AcREKV4uGkops7CAEdiVZQBQ/DC5eg==
From: "David Moughtin" <Davidm@Snackmate.com>
To: "MX5List" <mx5list@mx5club.org.nz>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Message-ID: <hx2ARC.A.OfG.HZZMGB@L733>
Looking back over previous emails on the subject of tyres, the Bridgestone G III appear to be a very suitable tyre choice. However, after speaking to Owen at Performance Tyres, he comments that whilst the GIII are a top of the range tyre, this fact also means that they suffer if they are not warmed up. (He offered Bridgestone GR50 S and S as an alternative). How much effect this will have on day to day running is only speculative.
I am not sure that it matters if my trip to work suffers by a few tenths of a second, but I would be interested in comments from those in the know about whether or not driving on colder G IIIs is really an issue.
Thank you
David Moughtin
National Vending (NZ) Ltd
PO Box 58 556, Greenmount
24 V Allright Place, Mount Wellington, Auckland
New Zealand
Telephone 64 9 570 1647
Facsimile 64 9 570 7146
Mobile 021 907 109
Email DavidM@Snackmate.com
