Ajax

Archives of Posts to the NZ MX5 List back in 2004
Locked
Fletch
Yes. I might just know (Trusted Advisor)
Yes. I might just know (Trusted Advisor)
Posts: 119
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 10:11 pm
Location: Auckland

Ajax

Post by Fletch » Thu Mar 04, 2004 9:51 pm

Ok,

I also have heard of this trick... Ajax, Vim, Bon-ami... they are all
fine pumice powder.

The theory goes that it breaks down as its ground between the rings and the
cylinder walls, and thus doesn't do any more damage to other areas like seals
or bearings (and you change the oil shortly after...)

Basically, its only a last resort... when you're already resigned to an
engine re-build if it doesn't work, and thus, have nothing to lose...

It IS NOT for old worn out rings, it will never make a worn engine good...
it is for when a re-built engine hasn't run in properly, and is burning so
much oil that you're going to pull it down again... and its an old old
trick, been around since before the 50's I believe?

Anyway... fess-up time... I've done it to the engine in my car!

I rebuilt it, had the bores honed in the way recommended by the ring
manufacturer, and it never ran in properly...still burnt oil 5000km later...
at a rate of about half a litre a week.

So, with nothing to lose, I tried it... it probably did nothing, or maybe
very little, but slowly, over the next 20,000km since the rebuild, oil
consumption is slowly improving... its down to half a litre a month now...
still higher than I'd like, but I can live with it. Was this "improvement"
due to the Ajax, or just more time? I don't know, but it doesn't seem to have
done any harm.

Your mileage may vary... :)

Its not something I'd recommend whole-heartedly to others, but if you've run
out of options, and are aware of the risks, I'd still try it again...

Fletch.
Red '90. Many n/a mods and Link ECU

Mikkels
Need, more, 5-ing, time....
Need, more, 5-ing, time....
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 9:04 pm

Ajax

Post by Mikkels » Fri Mar 05, 2004 6:18 pm

What a cool thread

Don
1990 NA with a 1.8 conversion SOLD
2005 NC Limited edition 2470/3500 6MT

Colin Francis

Ajax

Post by Colin Francis » Fri Mar 05, 2004 8:08 pm

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 18:18:35 +1300, you wrote:
What a cool thread

Don
But who is going to be brave enough to toss such a brasive stuff into the
engine of their pride and joy .?


Colin Francis
Krenford Holdings Ltd
P.O. Box 18547
Christchurch
New Zealand
Ph (64) 3 3387-450 or (64) 0 274 321-737

www.westmorland.co.nz

Reuben Tarran

Ajax

Post by Reuben Tarran » Fri Mar 05, 2004 8:50 pm

Somethng I heard a while ago from my very informed father:
Compare this topic to a v8 diesel 7 litre engine that my father had in his
truck, he read that the engine manufacturer (detroit diesel) had tested
their engines without any air filtration to see how much dust it would take
to seize the engine and weighed a sample of dust and added it to the air
intake at near full rpm (simulating a dusty air supply, not a whole lump at
once) and found that their engine seized after the addition of only 1gram of
dust. This
was their evidence that all engines need superior air filters, so why put
anything but air into the engine intake.
I agree that AJAX is signing its death certificate

Reuben.

Locked

Return to “2004”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 75 guests