NA/TURBO/SUPERCHARGE How much did you spend?

Discussions relating to Turbochargers, Superchargers, Induction, Engine Mods, Exhaust Mods, and other items specifically to make your MX5 or Roadster put out more power.

Moderators: Growler, jif, SLYDIT, Born_disturbed

Furai
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:57 pm
Location: New Zealand

NA/TURBO/SUPERCHARGE How much did you spend?

Post by Furai » Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:12 am

So everyone keeps telling me you wont get any power from NA and it will cost heaps, so I had alook into it and the 1.6 with ITBsand new injectors and tune yields a 50% power increase to 120WHP.

I worked out cost of parts with brand new pieces(So you could save a lot by using 4AGE ITBs or bike ones which would be much cheaper than the $1500 Jenvey ones.) came to a touch under $3500 shipped.

So that begs the question, how much did you spend and how much did you get?

Angreal
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1621
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: At the pub

Post by Angreal » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:13 am

Then you get the other problems like fueling etc. and wanting to upgrade everything else ;)

2k US for the FFS

Keith Jones
I count 5-s in my sleep
I count 5-s in my sleep
Posts: 329
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 6:30 pm
Location: Waiuku

Post by Keith Jones » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:30 am

I'm not sure whether you are asking about NA costs, but as a reference point, when we turbo'd my son's car last year we paid around $2000 to get 165rwhp.
That cost covered TD04 turbo, exhaust manifold, downpipe and 2.5inch stainless exhaust system, injectors, intercooler and piping, pod inlet, BOV and Megasquirt.

Snapfrozen
I am quitting my job and going 5-ing
I am quitting my job and going 5-ing
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:58 am

Post by Snapfrozen » Sun Jan 06, 2013 12:52 pm

Keith Jones wrote:I'm not sure whether you are asking about NA costs, but as a reference point, when we turbo'd my son's car last year we paid around $2000 to get 165rwhp.
That cost covered TD04 turbo, exhaust manifold, downpipe and 2.5inch stainless exhaust system, injectors, intercooler and piping, pod inlet, BOV and Megasquirt.
This si what I was trying to explain to you, and then the last 1.5k you can use for better brakes/drivetrain/gearing/bigger turbo/perming machine

Furai
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:57 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Furai » Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:15 pm

Angreal wrote:Then you get the other problems like fueling etc. and wanting to upgrade everything else ;)

2k US for the FFS
Hence the new injectors and computer :wink:
Keith Jones wrote:I'm not sure whether you are asking about NA costs, but as a reference point, when we turbo'd my son's car last year we paid around $2000 to get 165rwhp.
That cost covered TD04 turbo, exhaust manifold, downpipe and 2.5inch stainless exhaust system, injectors, intercooler and piping, pod inlet, BOV and Megasquirt.
Im not asking about NA costs but I worked that figure out using all brand new parts and Jenvey ITBs($1500) you could easily shave a grand off that figure with using other ITBs and more by going for some second hand parts as Im guessing you didnt buy all of that kit new?
Snapfrozen wrote: This si what I was trying to explain to you, and then the last 1.5k you can use for better brakes/drivetrain/gearing/bigger turbo/perming machine
Im not trying to say its better value, I just want to see the difference as it does not seem to be as big as you say. As I said those are all brand new top quality parts and I have put a bit of leeway in there as nothing ever goes to plan.

Angreal
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1621
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: At the pub

Post by Angreal » Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:49 pm

although I should be able to get in the low 200s whp but for now I'm still getting around to installing/setting up/procrastinating/deciding... I think my first setup will be 160hp just so I can keep it simple and get a cert sooner rather than later

Skilfil
I count 5-s in my sleep
I count 5-s in my sleep
Posts: 481
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 12:59 pm
Location: Auckland

Post by Skilfil » Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:53 pm

Don't forget how driveable a car should/can be. e.g a 200 HP 1.6 Turbo will be much easier to drive on the street and reliable than a 200 HP 1.6 N/A.

And I've heard countless N/A owners express regret at how much they poured into it, and how they get sick of when a turbo with half the cost just sails past on the track.

Imo only go for it, if you're an absolute fanatic for tuned N/A engines.

Snapfrozen
I am quitting my job and going 5-ing
I am quitting my job and going 5-ing
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:58 am

Post by Snapfrozen » Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:05 pm

And don't mind a high strung engine. My civic would be lapping cars making almost 1.5x my NA whp, and purely because they would break down every race meet

Furai
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:57 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Furai » Sun Jan 06, 2013 3:15 pm

Im not racing and Im not after huge figures, shoot the 80WHP(If Im lucky) that I have at the moment is nearly enough. Im not doing any race or super competitive stuff and heck my car has won a few Gymkhanas with the stock engine setup.

I will go for it in time, first thing I will do is buy a cheap low Km engine from Japan.

I was just interested in others setups to be honest, Im not justifying anything or saying its better I just wanted to see how far in I would be going.

Im definatly not aiming for 200HP I would be happy with 120WHP

WideOpenThrottle
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1293
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 11:35 am
Location: 36.8167° S, 174.4167° E

Post by WideOpenThrottle » Sun Jan 06, 2013 4:20 pm

And dont forget that 120hp will end up being too little in no time so after pouring all the money & time into it you then cant easily get realistic power unless you then turbo or SC.

If you build a Turbo or SC set-up first time round that is mild on HP then it should be really reliable and you are also well on the way to power up-grades when you want even more power [and it will happen]!

The good thing maybe with ITB's is not having to cert for road use as its automatic for Turbo/SC so cost saving there.
1989 NA 1650
1998 NB 1800
2005 NC 2000
1990 Landcruiser
Surfboard
Push-bike
Hiking shoes

Furai
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:57 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Furai » Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:04 pm

WideOpenThrottle wrote:And dont forget that 120hp will end up being too little in no time so after pouring all the money & time into it you then cant easily get realistic power unless you then turbo or SC.

If you build a Turbo or SC set-up first time round that is mild on HP then it should be really reliable and you are also well on the way to power up-grades when you want even more power [and it will happen]!

The good thing maybe with ITB's is not having to cert for road use as its automatic for Turbo/SC so cost saving there.
Dont worry Im crazy and wont get bored even with low power, Im planning for the future as I want to have the car(And Driver) ready before adding power.

Snapfrozen
I am quitting my job and going 5-ing
I am quitting my job and going 5-ing
Posts: 747
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 11:58 am

Post by Snapfrozen » Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:56 pm

What is it that you actually want the power for? Because you'll probably find all the usable power will be above 5k RPM

Bwarp
I count 5-s in my sleep
I count 5-s in my sleep
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:48 pm
Location: Wellington

Post by Bwarp » Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:11 pm

If i was gonna build an NA engine, i wouldn't give a shit about power outputs. Just put ITB's on and listen to the doooorts.

B6 engine is just another 4AGE, imo. and enough people N/A build their 4AGE's so why not do it to a B6. /naiive

ITB'd engines sound 10947405845859x better than vrmmmmm psssshhhhh.
Toolbox wrote:YOU ARE ONE VERY SICK PUPPY that likes to hide behind a computer. GOODBYE

Furai
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:57 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Furai » Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:37 pm

^This man is correct Haha

ITBs get you torque down low and response, not as much torq as FI but power isnt everything.

SLYDIT
Keep calm, Forum Moderator here.
Keep calm, Forum Moderator here.
Posts: 1610
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: In the Garage.

Post by SLYDIT » Sun Jan 06, 2013 6:52 pm

the b6 has such poor flow characteristics, i dont know why youd bother..the b6 certainly aint no honda (even non vtecs flow better than the b6 head.) to top it all off the b6 has over engineered rods and crank and pistons making them too heavy for decent revs that youd need to make good NA HP..and then theres cams to think about.

i think way back in 2006 i spent about 2500 on my turbo system not including clutch.
RED '90 TURBO.
SCARING PRIUS DRIVERS SINCE 2002

siren676
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:21 am
Location: Auckland

Post by siren676 » Sun Jan 06, 2013 7:36 pm

Will be following this thread to see what sort of results people have been getting for what sort of price.
Still cant make my mind up between turbo or supercharger
1990 NA6C MX5

sprsta
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1024
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:11 pm
Location: auckland

Post by sprsta » Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:28 pm

My initial turbo build was about $1200 inc FMLink ECU and a set of seond hand 380cc injectors
however i did make almost all of the pieces needed to make it work myself
plus $900 in cert and the first dyno tune

the first dyno run it made 203ps at the rear wheels, could have made more but the injectors got over 90%dc going any higher

after that i slowly spent around $2000 in upgrades to parts of the car around the setup but the bare bones remained the same

i got my own WBO2 and did my own tuning from then on so dont have any more dyno runs but the power runs that DataLog Lab does (supposedly pretty accurate) usually ended in the 240hp region

brownie
I count 5-s in my sleep
I count 5-s in my sleep
Posts: 408
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 10:19 pm
Location: CH CH

Post by brownie » Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:56 pm

SLYDIT wrote:the b6 has such poor flow characteristics, i dont know why youd bother..the b6 certainly aint no honda (even non vtecs flow better than the b6 head.) to top it all off the b6 has over engineered rods and crank and pistons making them too heavy for decent revs that youd need to make good NA HP..and then theres cams to think about.

i think way back in 2006 i spent about 2500 on my turbo system not including clutch.

Dunno what you call descent rev's,But with Chrome molly flywheel and 2 and 1/2 "exhaust and tweaked ECU i can get to 8000rpm
Wouldn't do all the time though on a 180km engine but feels good.
Like the idea of N/A myself for a street driver or a bit of Gymkhana type stuff.
Turbo for more fast track work.
I always think of them as spirited fun car to drive that won't try to kill you with moderate driver skill
Big horsepower on a chassis never designed for descent horsepower will
end in tears eventually,unless you are a good driver (be honest)

My 10 cents worth anyway

Mad Kiwi
I count 5-s in my sleep
I count 5-s in my sleep
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:42 am
Location: Auckland

Post by Mad Kiwi » Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:03 pm

BUT, Furai IS a good driver. He obviousley underates himself.

Coming from the motorcycle world there is/was a huge debate on 2 stroke versus 4 stroke. light versus heavy, revs/power v torque/power.

I was a huge 2 stroke proponant in road racing (250 production) and since switching to Motocross have conceded that 4st is the better option.

My heart says 2 stroke but performance and cost not to mention results are lead by the 4st.

Whats the relationsip?......almost exactly the same as NA v Boosted. I would much rather have an NA engine (light, revvy etc) but results, cost and suitability (the engine IS specc'd for boost as standard NOT NA) all point to boosted being the way to go in my opinion (sadly).

The same happens to bikes as cars re the 2st v 4st and NA v Boosted in MX5 land. Driveability and reliability all suffer. The same thing I found with rotaries (effectively a 2st four stroke...)

This from personal experiance and religuosly studying the forums and following up guys experiances.

Almost any standard or "breathed" on Honda or Toyota engine will KILL a modified NA MX5 engine. So I just can't see the point.

One thing I have learned in life is to play to strengths, trying to change a fundamentally poor or incorect thing very rarely works (and is often expensive in the process)...the MX5 engines are from a heavy and succesfull turbo heritage, why not play to this strength?

Just my opinion though.

Furai, whatever you do you will do it well I am sure.

Angreal
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1621
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: At the pub

Post by Angreal » Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:19 pm

Furai wrote:^This man is correct Haha

ITBs get you torque down low and response, not as much torq as FI but power isnt everything.
Supercharger ;) I'll get one of those stupid annoying whines like a missus when i plant the foot :p

siren676
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1115
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:21 am
Location: Auckland

Post by siren676 » Sun Jan 06, 2013 10:27 pm

Angreal wrote:
Furai wrote:^This man is correct Haha

ITBs get you torque down low and response, not as much torq as FI but power isnt everything.
Supercharger ;) I'll get one of those stupid annoying whines like a missus when i plant the foot :p
A supercharger is cheaper to run than a missus as well :lol:

Which supercharger kit did you go with in the end?
1990 NA6C MX5

Angreal
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1621
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: At the pub

Post by Angreal » Sun Jan 06, 2013 11:52 pm

siren676 wrote:
Angreal wrote:
Furai wrote:^This man is correct Haha

ITBs get you torque down low and response, not as much torq as FI but power isnt everything.
Supercharger ;) I'll get one of those stupid annoying whines like a missus when i plant the foot :p
A supercharger is cheaper to run than a missus as well :lol:

Which supercharger kit did you go with in the end?
The expensive ffs option

Furai
I have stars, you haven't. Deal with it
I have stars, you haven't.  Deal with it
Posts: 1394
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 5:57 pm
Location: New Zealand

Post by Furai » Mon Jan 07, 2013 1:28 pm

Mad Kiwi wrote:BUT, Furai IS a good driver. He obviousley underates himself.

Coming from the motorcycle world there is/was a huge debate on 2 stroke versus 4 stroke. light versus heavy, revs/power v torque/power.

I was a huge 2 stroke proponant in road racing (250 production) and since switching to Motocross have conceded that 4st is the better option.

My heart says 2 stroke but performance and cost not to mention results are lead by the 4st.

Whats the relationsip?......almost exactly the same as NA v Boosted. I would much rather have an NA engine (light, revvy etc) but results, cost and suitability (the engine IS specc'd for boost as standard NOT NA) all point to boosted being the way to go in my opinion (sadly).

The same happens to bikes as cars re the 2st v 4st and NA v Boosted in MX5 land. Driveability and reliability all suffer. The same thing I found with rotaries (effectively a 2st four stroke...)

This from personal experiance and religuosly studying the forums and following up guys experiances.

Almost any standard or "breathed" on Honda or Toyota engine will KILL a modified NA MX5 engine. So I just can't see the point.

One thing I have learned in life is to play to strengths, trying to change a fundamentally poor or incorect thing very rarely works (and is often expensive in the process)...the MX5 engines are from a heavy and succesfull turbo heritage, why not play to this strength?

Just my opinion though.

Furai, whatever you do you will do it well I am sure.
Thanks for the kind comments, Im still learning and haven't even come close to the full potential of my car.

What you are saying is quite correct, the reason Im quite fixed on NA is more the Balance and response. I am forever seeing videos of NA cars with less power than a Turbo version going just as if not more quickly.

This balance and response is quite vital in a chassis like the Roadster, or for me I feel it is.

This thread isn't supposed to be an NA vs Turbo battle though I was just interested in the cost of everyone's setups, but then again competitive human nature always kicks in :lol:

Joe
Hey. They are NOT Training wheels.
Hey.  They are NOT Training wheels.
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:09 pm

Post by Joe » Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:22 pm

Keith Jones wrote:I'm not sure whether you are asking about NA costs, but as a reference point, when we turbo'd my son's car last year we paid around $2000 to get 165rwhp.
That cost covered TD04 turbo, exhaust manifold, downpipe and 2.5inch stainless exhaust system, injectors, intercooler and piping, pod inlet, BOV and Megasquirt.
Hello, first post here, and I'm glad I saw this thread.

I was just about to buy a turbo kit from the US, but your builds seem alot cheaper, even excluding exchange rate and shipping. Do you source the parts locally?

I might need to re-think my plans, save a few bucks on the turbo to spend elsewhere on the car!

Donovan
I only think 5.
I only think 5.
Posts: 917
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:05 pm
Location: Auckland

Post by Donovan » Mon Jan 07, 2013 3:13 pm

Go NA, just use a 13B bridgeport, yeeehaa.

Post Reply

Return to “MX5 Power & Power Mods”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests